Contributing writer to 
The Jerusalem Post, Michael Ordman, whose piece was published on the online version of the newspaper 
(jpost.com)  spared his punches for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, and instead went to  town celebrating the Malaysian opposition leader’s defence of the Tel  Aviv regime, which was carried by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ)  recently.   
“And from the political world, I personally liked the news of the 
high regard  that Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim gave to the Jewish State  when asked whether he would open diplomatic ties with Israel,” observed  Ordman in his piece 
“We have Lift-off.”
Also blogging for 
‘Good News From Israel”, Ordman sits high on  the Israeli media’s credibility chain for his efforts in highlighting  the regime’s latest achievements in the fields of technology, health,  business, co-existence and building the Jewish State.
Last January 26, WSJ published Anwar’s provocative statement, where he  expressed support for the protection of the state of Israel, and in  which the influential paper noted that  “…although he stopped short of  saying he would open diplomatic ties with the Jewish state, a step which  he said remains contingent on Israel respecting the aspirations of  Palestinians”
What he said was evidence enough to merit the outpouring of criticisms  from many pockets of Malaysians, who unreservedly expressed dread should  he succeed in taking over Putrajaya along with his Pakatan Rakyat  cohorts.
Following the statement in WSJ, Anwar subsequently came out with  another statement on January 28 – this time through his official  website, 
anwaribrahimblog, where he emphasised his desire for a ‘two states solution’ as the most apt panacea for the Israeli-Palestinian stand-off.
The ‘two states solution’ is an idea lobbied by Jewish apologist  organisations in the likes of the International Crisis Group (ICG),  which suggested that both Israel and Palestine be given recognition as  legal and sovereign states, and that the Islamic world, in particular  the Arab countries establish diplomatic ties with Tel Aviv.
According to Anwar his position was consistent with the principles held  by PKR, which he said was in line with universal justice and the rights  of the oppressed.
He pointed to Resolution 1397 of the UN Security Council and the Arab  Peace Initiative, which were founded on the much-touted ‘two states  solution.’
Back in March 2008
, jpost.com journalist, Shani Ross wrote a  piece titled “Anwar Ibrahim: Malaysia’s Future Prime Minister?” which  unabashedly heaped praises on Anwar’s perceived resounding victory in  the 12
th General Election.
According to Ross, Anwar’s win had given a much needed boost for the  erstwhile Deputy Prime Minister to redeem his shine on the political  road.
“As a proponent of moderate Islam, cultural and religious impartiality,  and liberal democracy, Anwar's popularity is gaining strength, with  some reports suggesting that should the opposition coalition win the  next election, he may well be next in line as Malaysia's Prime  Minister,” wrote Ross, who was also the Coordinator for the Executive  Programs & Conferences at the International Institute for  Counter-Terrorism (ICT), Interdisciplinary Centre Herzliya, Israel.